From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
Date: | 2001-07-20 16:03:01 |
Message-ID: | 200107201603.f6KG31V16164@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> On Friday 20 July 2001 11:25, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am slightly concerned about bloating our CVS tree.
> The RPM additions are:
> 56 contrib-intarray.tar.gz
> 4 file-lists.tar.gz
> 180 jdbc7.0-1.1.jar
> 92 jdbc7.1-1.2.jar
> 8 migration-scripts.tar.gz
> 4 postgresql-7.1.plperl.patch
> 4 postgresql-7.1.s390x.patch
> 4 postgresql-bashprofile
> 4 postgresql-dump.1.gz
> 8 postgresql.init
> 20 README.rpm-dist
> 4 rh-pgdump.sh
> 8 rpm-pgsql-7.1.patch
>
> Of which the two jar files are derived from the source and wouldn't be
> necessary. This totals 124K if I've done my math right.
Bag the JAR's and it looks fine.
> The contrib-intarray.tar.gz is a new intarray from Red Hat -- I really need
> to investigate this more closely....
Can you research that? Why are they doing it?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-20 16:05:54 | Re: Re: Examples of using bytea type |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-07-20 15:59:24 | Re: VACUUM ANALYZE |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-07-20 16:28:33 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-20 16:02:21 | Re: C functions |