From: | Henry House <hajhouse(at)houseag(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dado Feigenblatt <dado(at)wildbrain(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql-Sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: nextval on insert by arbitrary sequence |
Date: | 2001-07-20 07:40:41 |
Message-ID: | 20010720004041.A5624@houseag.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 07:17:20PM -0700, Dado Feigenblatt wrote:
> I'm not sure if I worded the subject right, but my problem is this:
>
> I have a few entries in one table. Each row is the parent of many
> entries in a second table.
> In the second table I have a lot of entries referencing the entries on
> the first table.
> So far so good. Basic foreign key thing.
> The entries on the second table need to be numbered, but instead of a
> single sequence for all rows,
> I need a sequence per group of rows, according to their parent record.
>
> I have some ideas but they are not coming together.
> I thought of creating individual sequences for each new parent row, and
> maybe store its name in the parent row itself, so it can be accessed by
> it's children row.
> But then, how do I get a field on the second table to DEFAULT to
> nextval() on it's parent's sequence?
I have done this manally, by creating a sequence and the grabbing a unique
number from the sequence using 'SELECT nextval('seq_name'). I then use this
number in all the INSERTs.
Even though it takes one extra query, it is a simple approach and PostgreSQL
guarantees that the sequence will return unique, sequential numbers as long
as it is used consistently.
--
Henry House
OpenPGP key available from http://romana.hajhouse.org/hajhouse.asc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David M. Richter | 2001-07-20 08:49:34 | Query optimizing - paradox behave |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2001-07-20 03:47:25 | Re: nextval on insert by arbitrary sequence |