From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_depend |
Date: | 2001-07-17 13:55:15 |
Message-ID: | 200107171355.f6HDtFK29545@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > That was me. The point, however, was, given object id 145928, how the
> > > heck to you know what table this comes from?
> >
> > I think we will need the relid of the system table. I imagine four
> > columns:
> >
> > object relid
> > object oid
> > reference relid
> > references oid
>
> I'm not seeing the point. You're essentially duplicating the information
> that's already available in the system catalogs. This is bound to become
> a catastrophe the minute a user steps in and does manual surgery on some
> catalog. (And yes, manual surgery should still be possible.)
But how then do you find the system table that uses the given oid?
Wasn't that your valid complaint?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-17 14:56:10 | Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em |
Previous Message | Dominic J. Eidson | 2001-07-17 13:15:57 | Re: Odd error... |