From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime |
Date: | 2001-07-12 19:42:41 |
Message-ID: | 200107121942.f6CJgfE26255@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
> On Mi? 11 Jul 2001 20:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Mi? 11 Jul 2001 13:46, Ryan Mahoney wrote:
> > > > Hi Mark, This is being worked on now. I believe the 7.2 release will
> > > > have enable you to run a vacuum with no downtime.
> > >
> > > AFAIK, if UNDO is implemented, no vacuum will be needed to free space.
> > >
> > > It would be great if UNDO would clean indexes.
> >
> > UNDO is for rolling back aborted transactions. I have not heard it used
> > to eliminate vacuum.
>
> I most have read badly, but I'm almost sure that I heard that UNDO was gonna
> solve the overload that vacuum does on big DB.
> Which is, in that case, the real status of the future of UNDO?
UNDO was discussed as a solution for subtransactions and for row reuse
of aborted transactions. I have not heard it for clearing out expire
rows caused by DELETE or UPDATE.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guy Fraser | 2001-07-12 19:44:35 | Re: Bad news for Open Source databases, acording to survey |
Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2001-07-12 19:34:35 | Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-12 19:57:56 | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of JDBC character encoding |
Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2001-07-12 19:34:35 | Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime |