From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>, Tim Barnard <tbarnard(at)povn(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-06-27 22:51:05 |
Message-ID: | 200106272251.f5RMp5w26622@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> You can set up your machines however you wish. While I
> generally prefer Debian for standalone systems because
> dselect makes it easy to add and remove things without spending
> a lot of time looking for other files, I've found that recent
> Red Hat is very manageable, especially if you are building a
> custom installation or your own .rpm files.
Speaking of Debian, seems they are the first vendor to ship an
"enhanced" PostgreSQL distribution. Didn't someone report a new
pg_hba.conf option on Debian called "peer" recently. We don't have such
an option and it was never submitted to us a a patch. I don't remember
what it does.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-27 22:58:18 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2001-06-27 22:42:40 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |