From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])] |
Date: | 2001-06-27 18:07:19 |
Message-ID: | 200106271807.f5RI7Kx09313@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Done. See TODO web page for [java] link.
> Bruce,
>
> Can this email get added as detail for this todo item.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:33:44 -0700
> From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
> To: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net
> CC: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> References: <008301c0ff2d$c885d880$0201a8c0(at)INSPIRON>
>
> Dave,
>
> I personaly don't think it is worth the time to make this work correctly
> against a 7.0 database. I think we should focus on fixing this for 7.1
> first. Then later see if it still makes sense to work on getting 7.0
> support done.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > Barry,
> >
> > The getXXXFunctions aren't implemented
> > Some of the other functions are correct for version 7.1 but not for
> > previous versions. Ie. The row length, etc. I think the driver should
> > get the version and determine what is correct for each version.
> >
> > I think this is incorrect.
> > public boolean supportsSelectForUpdate() throws SQLException
> > {
> > // XXX-Not Implemented
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > There are a number of things here which are hard coded, and possible
> > wrong.
> >
> > I started to work on this, but since I am going on vacation next week I
> > have a number of fires to get down to a slow burn before I go.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Barry Lind [mailto:barry(at)xythos(dot)com]
> > Sent: June 26, 2001 9:22 PM
> > To: Dave Cramer
> > Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > Can you give a little more detail on what you mean by 'Improved
> > DatabaseMetaData'? What specific areas are currently lacking?
> >
> > thanks,
> > --Barry
> >
> >
> >
> >>>On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:56:18PM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I have to agree, we need to compile a todo list.
> >>>>
> >>>>Mine would include:
> >>>>
> >>>>1) Comprehensive test suite. This may be available already.
> >>>>2) Updateable resultSet
> >>>>3) Improved DatabaseMetaData
> >>>>4) Compatible blob support
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>Added to official PostgreSQL TODO:
> >>
> >>* JDBC
> >> * Comprehensive test suite. This may be available already.
> >> * Updateable resultSet
> >> * Improved DatabaseMetaData
> >> * Compatible blob support
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-06-27 18:09:30 | RE: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-06-27 17:51:30 | Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) |