Re: It's Apache, not PostgreSQL

From: wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com
To: "Bryan White" <bryan(at)arcamax(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: It's Apache, not PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-25 19:39:49
Message-ID: 200106251940.PAA01112@interlock2.lexmark.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

That limit can also be raised by changing a constant and recompiling Apache;
8190 is just the default. Check the online docs for LimitRequestLine at
httpd.apache.org.

"Bryan White" <bryan%arcamax(dot)com(at)interlock(dot)lexmark(dot)com> on 06/25/2001 02:59:30
PM

To: "Frank Hilliard" <frankhilliard%home(dot)com(at)interlock(dot)lexmark(dot)com>,
"psql-general" <pgsql-general%postgresql(dot)org(at)interlock(dot)lexmark(dot)com>
cc: (bcc: Wesley Sheldahl/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] It's Apache, not PostgreSQL

> It looks as if Apache has an HTTP input buffer limit of 8190 bytes which
> can be
> reduced with a "LimitRequestLine" directive, but not increased. I'm
> hitting this with
> both phpPgAdmin and Cold Fusion.

That sounds like a limit on the "GET" http request. Can you recode your
form to use POST? My guess is it does not have the same limit.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-06-25 19:40:55 Re: PostgreSQL: YMMV?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-25 19:15:47 Re: More Red Hat information