Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM?

* Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> [010624 00:46]:
> At 01:06 24/06/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >The answer: the query has nothing to do with it. However, the
> >deferred triggers you have on the target relation have a lot to do
> >with it. It's all deferred-trigger-event storage.
>
> Would it be worth using a local (system) temporary table for this sort of
> thing?
I this is an FK check, that I can probably turn off.

I wonder if there is a better way?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Philip Warner | __---_____
> Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
> (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
> Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
> Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
> Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
> | --________--
> PGP key available upon request, | /
> and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749