Re: COPY vs. INSERT

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: COPY vs. INSERT
Date: 2001-06-21 19:07:14
Message-ID: 20010621190714.5749D1A79@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thus spake Tom Lane
> darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:
> > I followed the instructions on interfacing user defined types as per
> > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/programmer/xindex.html.
> > In fact I helped write that page so I am pretty sure I got it right.
> > This code worked fine before. The only change I did was in the C code
> > to use PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1() style functions. I put in a lot of debug
> > statements and I am positive that the code is doing the right thing.
>
> Obviously it isn't. Care to show us the code?

Sure. ftp://ftp.vex.net/pub/glaccount.

By "right thing" I mean that when it gets a comparison it returns -1, 0 or
+1 depending on the comparison. The problem appears to be that the functions
just don't get called. That's why I suspect the SQL that sets up the
indexing instead.

And then there is the other 7.1.2 system that it works on.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-21 20:02:11 Re: [GENERAL] Call for alpha testing: planner statistics revisions
Previous Message Ed Loehr 2001-06-21 19:05:12 Re: [GENERAL] Call for alpha testing: planner statistics revisions