Re: patent

From: GH <grasshacker(at)over-yonder(dot)net>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patent
Date: 2001-06-19 03:36:11
Message-ID: 20010618223611.B20048@over-yonder.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:33:42PM -0500, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> i came across this patent in regard to main db usage, am i the only one
> who think this patent is rediculous?
>
> http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='5,832,497'.WKU.&OS=PN/5,832,497&RS=PN/5,832,497

Hi, I'd like to patent relational database normalization and, well, the
internet..oh, in the context of a job resume system.

This patent is complete filth.
Can you say "one-click" POS (piece of ...)?

gh

In response to

  • patent at 2001-06-19 02:33:42 from Thomas T. Thai

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-19 04:34:04 Re: max_expr_depth
Previous Message Joseph Shraibman 2001-06-19 03:25:09 Re: max_expr_depth