| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] indexability of << operator for inet/cidr |
| Date: | 2001-06-15 13:56:45 |
| Message-ID: | 200106151356.f5FDuj322159@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Patch removed from queue, awaiting updated version.
> Attached is a patch that explains to optimizer that its possible to use
> index when performing a << b where a is an inet/cidr value and b is a
> constant.
>
> Indexpath generated for such an expression is this:
> (a > network(b)) and (a <= set_masklen(broadcast(b, 32)))
>
> Since this is my first time delving in the guts of postgres, someone
> definitely should review it :)
>
> I mostly based my code on prefix_quals function for string types.
>
> Thanks
>
Content-Description:
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-15 14:03:48 | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-06-15 13:48:31 | UNIQUE INDEX unaware of transactions |