From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removal of temp tables |
Date: | 2001-06-14 17:25:37 |
Message-ID: | 200106141725.f5EHPbb11824@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Here is an updated patch that uses underscores in temp table names so
> > the DROP doesn't have to quote the table name:
>
> That seems like a reasonable idea, but don't do it to temp file
> names, ie, drop this part of the diff:
>
> > *** src/backend/storage/file/fd.c 2001/06/11 04:12:29 1.81
> > --- src/backend/storage/file/fd.c 2001/06/14 16:34:02
> > ***************
> > *** 756,762 ****
> > * transaction and database instance.
> > */
> > snprintf(tempfilepath, sizeof(tempfilepath),
> > ! "%s/%s%d.%ld", PG_TEMP_FILES_DIR, PG_TEMP_FILE_PREFIX,
> > MyProcPid, tempFileCounter++);
>
> > /*
> > --- 756,762 ----
> > * transaction and database instance.
> > */
> > snprintf(tempfilepath, sizeof(tempfilepath),
> > ! "%s/%s%d_%ld", PG_TEMP_FILES_DIR, PG_TEMP_FILE_PREFIX,
> > MyProcPid, tempFileCounter++);
>
> > /*
>
> There's no reason to spell temp file names as if they were rel names,
> and probably it's best not to make them look the same.
I was wondering that. The old vacuum file detection patch had the sort
files going into /pg_sorttemp and files called pid_. Your changes made
it pg_tempfile directory and pg_temp file names. I like the older names
that made them clear they were _not_ temp tables. Seemed you wanted
them to have similar names for reasons I couldn't figure.
I don't care if the sort files have dots so I will remove that part of
the patch, but I think we should consider making the sort files more
different than they are now --- dots vs. underscores.
> Also, an item I've ranted about before:
>
> > + #define is_temp_relname(relname) \
> > + (!strncmp(relname, PG_TEMP_REL_PREFIX, strlen(PG_TEMP_REL_PREFIX)))
>
> It's bad style to treat the result of strcmp or strncmp as though it
> were a boolean, cf
> http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=68294
> Write (strncmp(...) == 0) instead.
OK, changed.
> Otherwise the patch seems reasonable, although I wonder what your
> motivation was for choosing these particular IsSystemRelationName calls
> to tweak. It looks like you did more than the minimum needed to allow
> a DROP TABLE; why these extra ones and not others? (Not that I'm
> encouraging you to go around and hit every IsSystemRelationName call.
> If you did, that'll just be more changes that I suspect we'll have to
> remove again in the long run. I'm just curious why you touched, for
> example, VACUUM.)
I removed the vacuum part. I added it because it looked particularly
bad to do REINDEX on temp tables but I have no reason to know that for
sure.
Patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-06-14 17:39:18 | What (not) to do in signal handlers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-14 17:13:04 | Re: Removal of temp tables |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Ramsey | 2001-06-14 17:29:02 | possible patch to increase number of hash overflow pages? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-14 17:13:04 | Re: Removal of temp tables |