| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gary DeSorbo <isasitis(at)uchicago(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: INTERSECT AND ORDER BY |
| Date: | 2001-06-13 19:28:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20010613142857.A22695@wolff.to |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
You probably want to use:
SELECT date_worked, hours_worked
FROM hours
WHERE date_worked < '8/15/2001'
and date_worked > '8/8/2001'
ORDER BY date_worked
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:59:27AM -0700,
Gary DeSorbo <isasitis(at)uchicago(dot)edu> wrote:
> I am trying to use the query below:
>
> SELECT date_worked, hours_worked
> FROM hours
> WHERE date_worked < '8/15/2001'
> INTERSECT
> SELECT date_worked, hours_worked
> FROM hours
> WHERE date_worked > '8/8/2001'
> ORDER BY date_worked
>
> but Postgres does not seem to like the ORDER BY clause. Does
> anyone know if it is possible to use ORDER BY in conjunction with an
> INTERSECT statement? Does anyone have any alternative suggestions? I
> cannot use a temporary table because this is a Web-based application.
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> Gary
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Barnard | 2001-06-13 19:46:11 | Index rebuild question |
| Previous Message | bugi | 2001-06-13 19:15:53 | Re: followup on view/rule/delete problem. |