From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
Date: | 2001-06-13 14:08:37 |
Message-ID: | 200106131408.f5DE8br04024@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> The interaction that a PAM stack can initiate is limited to prompting for
> one or more values and getting strings as an answer. The PAM-using
> application registers a "conversation function" callback, which is
> responsible for issuing the prompt and getting at the data in an
> application-specific manner. Ideally, the libpq protocol and API would be
> extended to support this generality, but based on Dominic's comments the
> password exchange would work to support the useful subset of this
> functionality without any protocol or API changes.
>
> Most of the time, PAM is used as a wrapper around some password database
> like NIS or LDAP (or maybe even PostgreSQL).
We now have enough "yes" votes to apply this patch. I will give another
day for comments on the patch's contents.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2001-06-13 14:37:16 | SELECT Field1 || Field2 FROM Table |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-13 14:07:37 | Re: Indexing on a separate volume |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2001-06-13 14:36:06 | Re: reset all update |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-13 13:48:15 | Re: 7.1 odbc bug & patch |