| From: | Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
| Date: | 2001-06-12 17:09:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20010612190957.B8203@ilse.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:56:12AM -0400, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> Is there any interest in PAM support? If not, I will reject this patch.
Yeah, I would be interested. It would enable me to pull passwords from
LDAP, which should enable our helpdesk to support PostgreSQL better
(change requests for passwords now go via sysadmin, while all other
passwords (ftp, staging, accounts) are stored in a central repository).
However, to me it's more of a handy featured than a critical one.
Regards,
Mathijs
--
"Books constitute capital."
Thomas Jefferson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-06-12 17:12:58 | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-12 16:55:04 | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-06-12 17:12:58 | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-12 16:55:04 | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |