Re: AW: AW: Postgres Replication

From: Darren Johnson <djohnson(at)greatbridge(dot)com>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Postgres Replication
Date: 2001-06-12 14:37:18
Message-ID: 20010612.14371800@j2.us.greatbridge.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Imho an implementation that opens a separate client connection to the
> replication target is only suited for async replication, and for that a
WAL
> based solution would probably impose less overhead.

Yes there is significant overhead with opening a connection to a
client, so Postgres-R creates a pool of backends at start up,
coupled with the group communication system (Ensemble) that
significantly reduces this issue.

Very good points,

Darren

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-06-12 14:42:56 Re: global.bki vs template1.bki init files
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-06-12 14:01:02 Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: [SQL] behavior of ' = NULL' vs. MySQL vs. Stand ards