Re: OID Wrap

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OID Wrap
Date: 2001-06-11 20:42:14
Message-ID: 200106112042.f5BKgGR06027@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
> > cdinfo=# create view test as select * from zsong ;
> > ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "2156109797": Numerical result out of
> > range
>
> Is this 7.1? I thought we'd fixed all the places that treated OID
> values as signed.

It is 7.0.3. 7.1 has doubled the size of oid.

As a test using the CVS copy, I ran:

CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE pgdump_oid (dummy int4);
COPY pgdump_oid WITH OIDS FROM stdin;
3000000000 0
\.
DROP TABLE pgdump_oid;

and then to show it worked:

test=> create table test (x int);
CREATE
test=> insert into test values (1);
INSERT 3000000011 1

I then ran the regression tests, and they all passed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Mercer 2001-06-11 20:44:12 Re: inet/cidr type comparisons
Previous Message Vincent Roberts 2001-06-11 20:24:22 Calling lo_open within user defined C function