> Could it be that the 10000 rows in the table makes it so much slower so that
> the next 10000 in the same database but different table get so much slower?
>
> Daniel Akerud
It wasn't.
Now the database is cleared and VACUUMed and VACUUMED ANALYZEd before both
tests (table WITH and WITHOUT and index). Still same results. 195/194 seconds.
Daniel Akerud