Re: PL/pgSQL CURSOR support

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL CURSOR support
Date: 2001-05-31 17:16:15
Message-ID: 200105311716.f4VHGFS28125@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Jan has approved the following patch that allows both FOR and IS for
PL/PgSQL cursors.

> > DECLARE <name> CURSOR IS <select_stmt> is the Oracle PL/SQL
> > syntax. Since PL/pgSQL was written from the start with one
> > eye on portability from/to Oracle, I'd like to stick with
> > that.
> >
> > It's relatively simple to just substitute all PLpgSQL (and
> > other case combos) occurences by something else, then replace
> > the gram.y and scan.l files with whatever you want and voila,
> > you come up with another procedural language as compatible as
> > possible to your formerly preferred database. There is no
> > reason other than that we'll have more PL handlers to
> > support, why we shouldn't have two or three different
> > procedural SQL dialects. All can coexist and only those used
> > in your DB schema will get loaded.
>
> OK, how about this patch that allows both FOR and IS. Seems like a
> good idea, and we can document FOR.
>
> Also, I don't see any documentation on the new plpgsql cursor support.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 1.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-05-31 17:18:32 Re: Non-ASCII locales (was:Re: Imperfect solutions)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-31 17:00:03 Re: Access statistics