From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unused pg_class columns |
Date: | 2001-05-30 14:33:23 |
Message-ID: | 200105301433.f4UEXNn07967@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Are these columns in pg_class:
> > relukeys | relfkeys | relhaspkey
> > unused or what?
>
> They may be unused by the backend, but that doesn't mean that
> applications don't look at them. I find references to relhaspkey
> in pgaccess, for example.
So pgaccess just reads it but doesn't write it, right? Seems we should
mark this in the code so we can delete them some day, and perhaps remove
the refrence to it in pgaccess.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-30 14:39:35 | Re: Unused pg_class columns |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-30 14:17:45 | Re: Unused pg_class columns |