From: | Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parser abort ignoring following commands |
Date: | 2001-05-27 02:00:44 |
Message-ID: | 20010526190044.A15669@newsnipple.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:57:16PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > No, I think there is another problem. How about something without
> > > selects:
> >
> > > $ psql -c 'delete from pk; delete from xx;'
> > > ERROR: Relation 'xx' does not exist
> >
> > > "pk" exists, but nothing is deleted.
> >
> > Sure, because the transaction is rolled back. The whole string
> > is executed in one transaction. You will definitely break existing
> > applications if you change that.
>
> Applications that rely on this behaviour are broken. It was always said
> that statements are in their own transaction block unless in an explicit
> BEGIN/COMMIT block. A statement is defined to end at the semicolon, not
> at the end of the string you submit to PQexec().
You put semicolons at the end of your strings to PQexec()?
--
Adam Haberlach | At either end of the social spectrum there lies
adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com | a leisure class. -- Eric Beck 1965
http://www.newsnipple.com |
'88 EX500 '00 >^< | http://youlook.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-27 03:46:41 | Re: First version of multi-key index support for GiST |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-05-26 18:50:58 | Re: Parser abort ignoring following commands |