From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: JDBC commit to 7.1.2 |
Date: | 2001-05-22 19:20:01 |
Message-ID: | 200105221920.f4MJK1h29499@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
> The jdbc1 code does not have the problem that this patch corrects. So
> no it does not need to be and should not be applied to the jdbc1 area.
>
> I also noticed that that the original patch which was for the
> jdbc2/ResultSet.java file was also applied to the jdbc1/ResultSet.java
> file on the main trunk of the CVS. This will not work and that patch
> needs to be removed from jdbc1/ResultSet.java. (The variable the patch
> uses doesn't exist in the jdbc1 code thus the current jdbc1 code will
> not compile).
>
> The jdbc1 and jdbc2 sets of files are sufficiently different that
> patches for one should not be applied to the other.
Got it. Backed out of jdbc1 in current.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-05-22 19:43:00 | RE: Updating system catalogs after a tuple deletion |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-05-22 19:10:47 | Re: JDBC commit to 7.1.2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-05-22 20:10:30 | Re: Row-Level Locking? |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-05-22 19:10:47 | Re: JDBC commit to 7.1.2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-22 21:48:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: JDBC commit to 7.1.2 |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-05-22 19:10:47 | Re: JDBC commit to 7.1.2 |