From: | Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |
Date: | 2001-05-22 07:25:59 |
Message-ID: | 20010522071641.9F99A1C49B@mx.webmailstation.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > As a rule of thumb, online applications that hold open
> > transactions during user interaction are considered to be
> > Broken By Design (tm). So I'd slap the programmer/design
> > team with - let's use the server box since it doesn't contain
> > anything useful.
>
> Many web applications use persistent database connections for performance
> reasons.
Persistent connection is not the same as an OPEN transaction BTW.
> I suppose it's unlikely for webapps to update a row and then sit and wait a
> long time for a hit, so it shouldn't affect most of them.
>
> However if long running transactions are to be aborted automatically, it
> could possibly cause problems with some apps out there.
>
> Worse if long running transactions are _disconnected_ (not just aborted).
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp(at)perchine(dot)com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kaare Rasmussen | 2001-05-22 07:37:36 | Feedback |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2001-05-22 07:19:53 | AW: Is stats update during COPY IN really a good idea? |