Re: AW: [HACKERS] Fix for tablename in targetlist

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Fix for tablename in targetlist
Date: 2001-05-21 18:36:01
Message-ID: 200105211836.f4LIa1W10171@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


Patch applied and attached. TODO updated.

> Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> >> select pg_class from pg_class;
>
> > Probably a valid interpretation would be if type pg_class or opaque had an
> > output function.
>
> Hmm, good point. We shouldn't foreclose the possibility of handling
> things that way. Okay, I'm convinced: allowing .* to be omitted isn't
> a good idea.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 2.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2001-05-21 19:05:19 PL/pgSQL CURSOR support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-21 18:07:28 Re: Is stats update during COPY IN really a good idea?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-05-22 00:27:28 Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-21 17:42:40 Re: AW: Fix for tablename in targetlist