Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()

> Bruce got pounded (quite properly I thought) for applying patches
> during late beta that he had not verified and indeed was not in a
> position to verify. The rules need to be at least as stringent for
> patches that go into a stable-release branch, since we don't normally
> do much beta testing for dot-releases. But as long as someone has
> adequately checked the patch, I don't think there should be a rule
> against putting bug fixes into 7.1.* ...

Toward the end, I actually got approval from other JDBC developers
before applying patches and people were still not happy. Also, this was
during feature freeze in February, not even in beta yet.

I know it was February because I just applied all my outstanding JDBC
patches since February 1, and many of those should probably have been in
7.1.X too.

So, I am not going to apply it. If someone else wants to, go ahead.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026