Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Python Module Patch

From: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pgsql-Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Python Module Patch
Date: 2001-05-17 13:59:24
Message-ID: 20010517095924.D487@dothill.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce,

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 06:11:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> To be in 7.1.X, it would have to be a big bug and the patch of low risk.

I guess that I met the second criterion but not the first. Nevertheless,
the policy is very reasonable and acceptable. I've managed to avoid
maintaining a patch list up until now -- oh, well...

BTW, I'm very impressed by the the PostgreSQL development process
and IMHO it is a role model for the open source community.

Thanks,
Jason

--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-17 14:03:07 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Python Module Patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-17 13:18:04 Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()