From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_iplf |
Date: | 2001-05-15 00:49:03 |
Message-ID: | 200105150049.f4F0n3I00231@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> I recommend reverting that change.
>
> > Doing it now, but just to the system catalogs. No reason to keep the
> > backend code.
>
> That's debatable; someday we might want the thing (after we fix CLUSTER).
> At least revert the client changes too.
In fact, the only reason I started poking around here is because I am
evaluating a JDBC patch that was going to reference indisclustered. The
user was guessing that it related to HASH, just like the ODBC coder.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-05-15 00:57:15 | Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-15 00:33:00 | Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl |