From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl |
Date: | 2001-05-15 00:23:39 |
Message-ID: | 200105150023.f4F0NdB25488@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Why did you remove indisclustered?
> >>
> >> Useless it may be, but gratuitously breaking at least two extant clients
> >> doesn't seem like a good idea ...
>
> > I patched the clients also. Is that a problem?
>
> Yes. People frequently try to use clients that aren't the same rev
> as the server. There's no good reason to remove this column at all,
> and creating a version incompatibility for two major clients seems like
> sufficient reason not to.
>
> I recommend reverting that change.
Doing it now, but just to the system catalogs. No reason to keep the
backend code.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-15 00:25:07 | Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-15 00:16:14 | Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl |