Re: Lisp as procedural language

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date: 2001-05-08 19:29:22
Message-ID: 200105081929.f48JTMP24768@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > > Can someone explain why we have a lisp.sgml file in our docs? Seems it
> > > > descripes a 3rd party Emacs interface. I don't think we should start
> > > > distributing docs for software we don't distribute. Can I remove it?
> > >
> > > Only if you move the pointer to someplace more appropriate (don't we
> > > have somewhere on the website with links to outside software?)
> >
> > We sure do:
> >
> > http://postgresql.readysetnet.com/interfaces.html
>
> Might as well move pgadmin.sgml there too.

Agreed. Removed.

However, I see no mention of pgadmin in our Interfaces or Enhancements
page. Do we want to add it? There is lots of stuff on greatbridge.org
now, (including my pgmonitor :-). Is there stuff on pgsql.com too? Not
sure how to get those listed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-08 19:51:54 Re: incorrect query result using complex structures (views?)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-05-08 19:23:03 Re: Lisp as procedural language