| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Dateadd |
| Date: | 2001-05-07 17:04:45 |
| Message-ID: | 200105071704.f47H4jJ13963@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> There was some talk recently of putting together packages of function
> and operator definitions to ease portability from other DBMSes to PG.
> I'd have no objection to including "+ as string concatenation" in a
> set of operators that're clearly marked as MS-SQL-isms. But I don't
> think we'd do the world any favor by adopting a clearly nonstandard
> notation as part of our standard operator set.
Now that someone else thinks this is a good idea, I have added to the
TODO list:
* Allow plug-in modules to emulate features from other databases
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David D. Kilzer | 2001-05-07 17:27:59 | Using ORDER BY with AGGREGATE/GROUP BY in a SELECT statement |
| Previous Message | tjk@tksoft.com | 2001-05-07 16:32:42 | Re: Re: Need help with search-and-replace |