Re: File system performance and pg_xlog

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: File system performance and pg_xlog
Date: 2001-05-07 16:12:43
Message-ID: 200105071612.f47GChj10154@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> If one looks at the FAT file system with an open mind and a clear understanding
> of how it will be used, some small modifications may make it the functional
> equivalent of a managed table space volume, at least under Linux.

Can I ask if we are talking FAT16 (DOS) or FAT32 (NT)?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2001-05-07 16:26:31 Re: File system performance and pg_xlog
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-07 16:09:41 Re: File system performance and pg_xlog