| From: | Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | rolf(at)sir-wum(dot)de, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug-report (was: JDBC driver in pgsql 7.1 build problem) |
| Date: | 2001-05-04 20:29:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20010504222935.A9873@l-t.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:14:07PM +0300, Ned Wolpert wrote:
> > > Yes. I could compile 7.1 with ant 1.3 without a problem.
> >
> > And Sun's JDK 1.3?
> >
>
> Yes.
Fun. Back on square one. So: on some unknown cases Ant 1.2/1.3
with combination of JDK1.3 will have following problems:
* Ant cannot parse '-option' after target name.
* Ant cannot create .jar without manifest file. (This one
was a pain to find out as the error message was very
confusing.)
One bad Ant in Debian's package. First I thought it is only
Debian specific, but seems its not the case.
My patch does following:
* rearranges ant command line
* specifies manifest file
Is it too much asked to include this upstream? I can ofcourse
continue to spam this list with link to patch.
My conclusion: Ant is nice concept, but still too unstable for
relying on it. *shrug*
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-05-05 01:26:09 | Re: Re: A bug with pgsql 7.1/jdbc and non-ascii (8-bit) chars? |
| Previous Message | Ned Wolpert | 2001-05-04 20:08:00 | Re: Bug-report (was: JDBC driver in pgsql 7.1 build problem) |