Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Date: 2001-05-03 00:18:21
Message-ID: 200105030018.f430ILA02066@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Yes, this double-writing is a problem. Suppose you have your WAL on a
> > separate drive. You can fsync() WAL with zero head movement. With a
> > log based file system, you need two head movements, so you have gone
> > from zero movements to two.
>
> It may be worse depending on how the filesystem actually does
> journalling. I wonder if an fsync() may cause ALL pending
> meta-data to be updated (even metadata not related to the
> postgresql files).
>
> Do you know if reiser or xfs have this problem?

I don't know, but the Linux user reported xfs was really slow.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-03 00:19:23 Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-02 23:51:04 Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL