Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Date: 2001-05-02 21:36:45
Message-ID: 200105022136.f42Lajl01886@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The "problem" with log based filesystems is that they most likely
> do not know the consequences of a write so an fsync on a file may
> require double writing to both the log and the "real" portion of
> the disk. They can also exhibit the problem that an fsync may
> cause all pending writes to require scheduling unless the log is
> constructed on the fly rather than incrementally.

Yes, this double-writing is a problem. Suppose you have your WAL on a
separate drive. You can fsync() WAL with zero head movement. With a
log based file system, you need two head movements, so you have gone
from zero movements to two.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-02 21:38:03 Collation order for btree-indexable datatypes
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-05-02 21:28:07 Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems