| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems | 
| Date: | 2001-05-02 21:36:45 | 
| Message-ID: | 200105022136.f42Lajl01886@candle.pha.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
> The "problem" with log based filesystems is that they most likely
> do not know the consequences of a write so an fsync on a file may
> require double writing to both the log and the "real" portion of
> the disk.  They can also exhibit the problem that an fsync may
> cause all pending writes to require scheduling unless the log is
> constructed on the fly rather than incrementally.
Yes, this double-writing is a problem.  Suppose you have your WAL on a
separate drive.  You can fsync() WAL with zero head movement.  With a
log based file system, you need two head movements, so you have gone
from zero movements to two.
-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-02 21:38:03 | Collation order for btree-indexable datatypes | 
| Previous Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2001-05-02 21:28:07 | Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems |