Re: big pg 6.5 and 7.1 problem in simple application

From: "Eric G(dot) Miller" <egm2(at)jps(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: big pg 6.5 and 7.1 problem in simple application
Date: 2001-05-03 01:37:06
Message-ID: 20010502183706.C4206@calico.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:23:14PM -0700, Aaron Brashears wrote:
> We have a simple ad tracking application, which has a (mostly) fixed
> table size where each row represents a particular ad. We have about 70
> rows in the database and use php scripts in apache which connect over
> odbc, read a single row, increment a counter, and update that
> row. We're performing about 30 updates a second and after a few
> minutes the postmaster either hangs or dumps core.
>
> We've tried this scenario on both pg 6.5 and 7.1 on redhat linux, from
> redhat's rpms and built from source with the same results. We launch
> 256 backends with a reasonable shared buffer size. We're using the
> unixodbc's odbc driver version 2.0.5. I don't think we're doing row
> locks for the query, but that shouldn't crash it - it should just give
> us bad data.
>
> The tables, selects, and update calls are all pretty simple, so I'm
> baffled by this behavior. Has anyone else seen this problem, or have a
> solution?

I'll make a WAG:

1) odbc adds overhead to the queries...
2) 30 updates per second possibly leads to swamping postmaster with
connection attempts (and/or it hits the limit on connections), unless
there's some connection pooling...

Can't say this'd work, but inserts are generally faster than updates,
especially if there aren't any key checks. So, maybe it'd work better
to insert into a counter table an ID for the advertisement and have
a timestamp with default now(). Then have a cron job running at
appropriate intevals to update the summary stats, then truncate the
table (wrapped in a transaction). Hmm, the timestamp may be
unnecessary. Can't say if it'd solve the problem. There'd be a little
bottleneck everytime the summary stats are updated.

--
Eric G. Miller <egm2(at)jps(dot)net>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-03 01:46:43 Re: Multi Procerssor
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-03 01:36:42 Re: Re: update ... from where id in (..) question