| From: | geustace(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: On the _need_ to vacuum... |
| Date: | 2001-04-29 16:53:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20010429043342.B59791B4DE@agree-6.godzone.net.nz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I am rather staggered by a developer considering it necessary to
attempt to cooerce the core development team into including a patch.
If the work that Alfred has done is as effective as he claims, then
there must be a *REALLY* good reason why it isn't being included.
I don't want to start any form of war....
But as a user I'd be interested to know why such a patch would appear
to be unacceptable.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Glen Eustace,
GodZone Internet Services, a division of AGRE Enterprises Ltd.,
P.O. Box 8020, Palmerston North, New Zealand 5301
Ph/Fax: +64 6 357 8168, Mob: +64 21 424 015
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eliel Mamousette | 2001-04-29 17:08:02 | SQL Server -> Postgres migration: Stored Procedure replacement? |
| Previous Message | Paul M Foster | 2001-04-29 16:31:13 | Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum... |