Re: Re: RC3 ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: RC3 ...
Date: 2001-04-07 01:25:15
Message-ID: 200104070125.VAA01903@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > That strikes me as an awfully web-centric view of things. Not everyone
> > has an always-on high-speed Internet link.
> >
> > If you want to make the docs and TODO.detail be a separate chunk of the
> > split distribution, that's fine with me. But I don't agree with
> > removing them from the full tarball.
> >
> > OTOH, if Marc was only thinking of removing the pre-built docs from the
> > tarball, I don't object to that. I'm not sure why those weren't
> > distributed as separate tarballs from the get-go. I just say that the
> > doc sources are part of the source distribution...
>
> But, why? That sounds like a highly DSL-centric view of things *grin* If
> someone really wants docs, what hurts a second GET ftp call?

A major issue is that we don't regenerate docs for 7.1.1 or later, so
the 7.1 docs carry for all the 7.1.X releases. That would seem to argue
for a separate tarball for docs so people don't redownload the docs
again for 7.1.1.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-04-07 02:08:24 Re: Re: RC3 ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-04-07 01:23:35 Re: Re: RC3 ...