From: | Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Fred Yankowski <fred(at)ontosys(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug |
Date: | 2001-04-04 02:38:51 |
Message-ID: | 20010403223851.A3119@dothill.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches pgsql-ports |
Tom,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 06:03:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm. It seems a little bit weird (no, a lot weird) to be referencing
> -lpostgres for the client-side interface library builds. I can see that
> the PL-language DLLs might need to reference -lpostgres during their
> links, but I've got severe doubts that this is a good idea anyplace
> else.
You are correct. I just verified by using MS's dumpbin that none
of the above DLLs except for plpgsql.dll actually import any symbols
from libpostgres.a. Hence, linking the client-side interface libraries
with libpostgres.a is superfluous.
However, you missed a few regression test related DLLs. See below for
details.
> My thought is that Makefile.win ought to have
>
> DLLLIBS=-lcygipc -lcygwin -lcrypt -lkernel32
>
> which is what will be used by Makefile.shlib to build the interfaces
> libraries.
I agreed with the above except that the -lcygwin and -lkernel32 are
unnecessary. Cygwin's ld always supplies these options. This is true
for both the Net and b20.1 releases.
> Then in the makefiles for the PL directories we should write
>
> DLLLIBS:= -L$(top_builddir)/src/backend -lpostgres $(DLLLIBS)
>
> so that -lpostgres is added just for the links of those shlibs.
I agree with the above too.
> And finally backend/Makefile could use the Makefile.win definition as-is.
I agree with the above too. Additionally, when Fred is ready with his
NT service patch, then he can add the following to backend/Makefile:
DLLLIBS:= $(DLLLIBS) -lpopt
> Comments? If this seems plausible, could you test it?
Yes, I have tested this on the Net release. Is someone else willing to
test on b20.1 -- I'm not confident of my b20.1 setup.
When I executed make check, I noticed that the following DLLs are also
dependent on libpostgres.a:
contrib/spi/autoinc.dll
contrib/spi/refint.dll
src/test/regress/regress.dll
So I used the same change that you proposed for plpgsql.dll for these too.
Did we miss any others?
With the attached patch applied to my CVS working directory, I was able
to build PostgreSQL without errors.
When I run make check, I am getting consistent failures with horology.
I don't believe that this is related to this build related patch. See
attached for details. Am I correct?
> BTW, I see that the prior version of backend/Makefile actually defined
> DLLLIBS as
>
> DLLLIBS := -L/usr/local/lib -lcygipc -lcrypt -lcygwin -lkernel32
>
> as compared to what Makefile.win offers (shorn of the backend):
>
> DLLLIBS=-lcygipc -lcygwin -lcrypt -lkernel32
>
> Any comments on whether -L/usr/local/lib is appropriate here or not?
We have already determined that the -L/usr/local/lib option is
superfluous for both the Cygwin Net and b20.1 releases. See the
following for details:
http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-ports/2001-03/msg00049.html
> What about the ordering of these libraries, does that matter?
I believe that -lcygipc and -lcrypt are independent of each other and
that the -lcygwin and -lkernel32 are unnecessary, so no the order doesn't
matter.
Jason
--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgsql.patch | text/plain | 2.2 KB |
regression.diffs | text/plain | 1.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-04-04 02:40:32 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-04-03 22:16:52 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-04-04 02:40:32 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-04-03 22:16:52 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug |