Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index?

From: Paul Tomblin <ptomblin(at)xcski(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index?
Date: 2001-04-01 21:32:46
Message-ID: 20010401173246.A2658@allhats.xcski.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Quoting ADBAAMD (adba(dot)amdocs(at)bell(dot)ca):
> Paul Tomblin wrote:
> > I think I understand now. If this is correct, then doesn't it make sense
> > just to drop that index? At least until I get a lot more data from other
> > countries?
>
> Probably you are right.

Ok, thanks for all the help everybody.

--
Paul Tomblin <ptomblin(at)xcski(dot)com>, not speaking for anybody
Don't use a big word where a diminutive one will suffice.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Harding 2001-04-01 21:34:11 Re: another index question
Previous Message Joel Burton 2001-04-01 21:32:42 Re: Can I get the default value for an attribute (field) ?