| From: | Paul Tomblin <ptomblin(at)xcski(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index? | 
| Date: | 2001-04-01 20:10:29 | 
| Message-ID: | 20010401161029.B26334@allhats.xcski.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
Quoting ADBAAMD (adba(dot)amdocs(at)bell(dot)ca):
> Paul Tomblin wrote:
> > I have a table with columns 'country' and 'state'.  I put indexes on both
> > of them.  I've done the "vacuum analyze" as per the faq.  But when I ask
> > it to explain, it says it will use the index on 'state' if I do a
> >     select * from waypoint where state = 'ON';
> > but it won't use the index on 'country' if I do a
> >     select * from waypoint where country = 'CANADA';
> 
> 	Maybe it's just my Oracle side, but doesn't country has a too low 
> selectivity?
If I try 
    explain select * from waypoint where country = 'BELIZE';
a query that will only select one record out of the 8300-odd, it still
doesn't use the index.
    Seq Scan on waypoint  (cost=455.13 rows=6813 width=130)
-- 
Paul Tomblin <ptomblin(at)xcski(dot)com>, not speaking for anybody
Mommy, what does "Formatting Drive C:" mean?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-01 20:13:42 | Re: another index question | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-01 20:08:50 | Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index? |