Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index?

From: Paul Tomblin <ptomblin(at)xcski(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index?
Date: 2001-04-01 20:10:29
Message-ID: 20010401161029.B26334@allhats.xcski.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Quoting ADBAAMD (adba(dot)amdocs(at)bell(dot)ca):
> Paul Tomblin wrote:
> > I have a table with columns 'country' and 'state'. I put indexes on both
> > of them. I've done the "vacuum analyze" as per the faq. But when I ask
> > it to explain, it says it will use the index on 'state' if I do a
> > select * from waypoint where state = 'ON';
> > but it won't use the index on 'country' if I do a
> > select * from waypoint where country = 'CANADA';
>
> Maybe it's just my Oracle side, but doesn't country has a too low
> selectivity?

If I try
explain select * from waypoint where country = 'BELIZE';
a query that will only select one record out of the 8300-odd, it still
doesn't use the index.
Seq Scan on waypoint (cost=455.13 rows=6813 width=130)

--
Paul Tomblin <ptomblin(at)xcski(dot)com>, not speaking for anybody
Mommy, what does "Formatting Drive C:" mean?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-04-01 20:13:42 Re: another index question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-04-01 20:08:50 Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index?