From: | Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | bruc(at)acm(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Spinlocks on SGI's |
Date: | 2001-03-27 14:02:49 |
Message-ID: | 20010327160249.E62357@ilse.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 08:59:45AM -0500, Robert E. Bruccoleri allegedly wrote:
> I contributed the first working s_lock.c code for the SGI's over three
> years ago (using the test_and_set library calls). It's been working
> for me ever since in a heavy multi-user environment. Please don't
> change it unless there's an overwhelming reason.
>
> Also, the GNU compiler systems works poorly on SGI's. In this
> environment, you need to stick to the SGI provided compilers. Once you
> get used to them, they work fairly well.
The problem is that SGI wants a couple of hundred dollars for it :(
Regards,
Mathijs
--
It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's that the language
rewards idiotic behavior in a way that no other language or tool has
ever done.
Erik Naggum
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert E. Bruccoleri | 2001-03-27 14:15:50 | Re: Spinlocks on SGI's |
Previous Message | Robert E. Bruccoleri | 2001-03-27 13:59:45 | Spinlocks on SGI's |