Re: RE: Compiling

From: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
To: Mike Cannon-Brookes <mcannon(at)internet(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RE: Compiling
Date: 2001-03-27 11:04:26
Message-ID: 20010327130425.A23185@l-t.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> Well Peter, I must say many would disagree with you there ;)

* NSHO about ant deleted *

> 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> (for 4 substitutions). It seems unnecessarily complex to add make when we
> can remove it completely and not lose any functionality.

Peter E, Peter M: how about build.xml.in, where the needed
substitutions are done in configure end-phase? I can prepare
patch if this is acceptable.

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-27 16:56:53 RE: Compiling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-27 01:00:54 Re: [JDBC] Possible large object bug?