| From: | Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: all views in database broken at once |
| Date: | 2001-03-25 17:14:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20010325191424.A60295@ilse.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 11:36:56PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl> writes:
> > How about being able to recompile them (keeping the SQL around in the
> > system catalogs)? Doesn't Oracle allow you to do something like that?
>
> That's another possibility. It's not real clear that there's any
> advantage to storing rules in preparsed form to begin with --- if
> we just stored the original text and reparsed it each time it was
> read, the system would be vastly more flexible, and probably not
> noticeably slower.
But every bit of performance counts, of course...
Mathijs
--
"Borrowers of books -- those mutilators of collections, spoilers of the
symmetry of shelves, and creators of odd volumes."
Charles Lamb (1775-1834)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Roberto Mello | 2001-03-25 19:37:29 | Re: Help |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-03-25 12:57:14 | Re: all views in database broken at once |