Re: pgindent run?

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > and most times, those have to be merged into the source tree due to
> > extensive changes anyway ... maybe we should just get rid of the use of
> > pgindent altogether?
>
> I think pgindent is a good thing; the style of different parts of the
> code would vary too much without it. I'm only unhappy about the risk
> issues of running it at this late stage of the release cycle.

This is the usualdiscussion. Some like it, some don't like the risk,
some don't like the timing. I don't think we ever came up with a better
time than before RC, though I think we could do it a little earlier in
beta if people were not holding patches during that period. It is the
beta patching folks that we have the most control over.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026