Re: Re: RELEASE STOPPER? nonportable int64 constants in pg_crc.c

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: RELEASE STOPPER? nonportable int64 constants in pg_crc.c
Date: 2001-03-22 04:45:58
Message-ID: 200103220445.XAA13564@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Can we use (long long) rather than LL?
>
> No.

Can I ask how 0LL is different from (long long)0?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2001-03-22 04:47:52 Re: More on elog and error codes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-22 04:45:17 Re: pgindent run?