Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.

Can't we do something with atexit or other PORTABLE end stuff?

I'll look at it for 7.2.

LER

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 3/22/01, 10:16:03 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote regarding
Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.:

> Larry Rosenman writes:

> > cc -G -Wl,-z,text -Wl,-h,libpsqlodbc.so.0 -Wl,-Bsymbolic info.o bind.o
columninfo.o connection.o convert.o drvconn.o environ.o execute.o lobj.o
misc.o options.o pgtypes.o psqlodbc.o qresult.o results.o socket.o parse.o
statement.o gpps.o tuple.o tuplelist.o dlg_specific.o -lm
-Wl,-R/usr/local/pgsql/lib -o libpsqlodbc.so.0.26
> > UX:ld: ERROR: psqlodbc.o: symbol: '_fini' multiply defined; also in file
/usr/ccs/lib/crti.o
> > gmake[3]: *** [libpsqlodbc.so.0.26] Error 1

> This is a known portability problem on Unixware (at least known to me)
and
> probably other non-GCC setups.

> > Why do WE define _fini?

> Because we need to 'fini' something, I suspect.

> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/