Re: new version of contrib-intarray

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: new version of contrib-intarray
Date: 2001-03-18 00:59:51
Message-ID: 200103180059.TAA22335@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I checked README.intarray to see what the most recent date was, and it
was Jan 10, so I knew that this version was newer. I then did a diff -c
against the current CVS and I didn't see anything unusual in the
changes.

Attached is the CVS diff command line showing me all the changes made:

cvs diff -c -D '2001-01-13 00:00:00' -D'2001-03-16 00:00:00' .

I see change of += in CFLAGS (harmless), movement of #include
<postgres.h>, and removal of // comments, which don't appear anymore in
the code.

Do you see anything else? This one was easy to track because it was
installed only recently, but other /contrib stuff is much tougher
because you never know what the original install date was.

I usually only look at Makefile changes in /contrib because that is
where most of the customization is, and I don't see any changes made to
Makefile by the patch. It doesn't even touch the CFLAGS += change.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 4.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-03-18 01:13:59 Re: beta6 pg_restore core dumps
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-17 23:40:24 Re: new version of contrib-intarray