Re: Re[4]: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Xu Yifeng <jamexu(at)telekbird(dot)com(dot)cn>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re[4]: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date: 2001-03-16 20:15:58
Message-ID: 20010316121558.G29888@fw.wintelcom.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 3/16/01, 11:10:34 AM, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote
> regarding Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC :
>
> > But, with shared libraries, are you really pulling in a "whole
> > thread-support library"? My understanding of shared libraries (altho it
> > may be totally off) was that instead of pulling in a whole library, you
> > pulled in the bits that you needed, pretty much as you needed them ...

* Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> [010316 10:02] wrote:
> Yes, you are. On UnixWare, you need to add -Kthread, which CHANGES a LOT
> of primitives to go through threads wrappers and scheduling.
>
> See the doc on the http://UW7DOC.SCO.COM or http://www.lerctr.org:457/
> web pages.
>
> Also, some functions are NOT available without the -Kthread or -Kpthread
> directives.

This is true on FreeBSD as well.

--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-03-16 20:18:26 Re: Performance monitor signal handler
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-16 19:58:38 Re: Problems with outer joins in 7.1beta5