Re: Re: [SQL] Re: why the DB file size does not reduce when 'delete'the data in DB?

From: yves(at)mail2(dot)vlaanderen(dot)net
To: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [SQL] Re: why the DB file size does not reduce when 'delete'the data in DB?
Date: 2001-03-16 01:28:46
Message-ID: 20010316022846.A3804@asua2.vlaanderen.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:01:36AM +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > You are not quite factually correct above, even given your definition of
> > > "bug". PostgreSQL does reuse deleted record space, but requires an
> > > explicit maintenance step to do this.
> > Could you tell us what that maintenance step is? dumping the db and restoring into a fresh one ? :/
>
> :) No, "VACUUM" is your friend for this. Look in the reference manual
> for details.
>
> - Thomas

I'm having this problem:
I have a database that is 3 megabyte in size (measured using pg_dump). When
i go to the corresponding data directory (eg du -h data/base/mydbase), it
seems the real disk usage is 135 megabyte! Doing a VACUUM doesn't really
change the disk usage.

Also query & updating speed increases when i dump all data and restore
it into a fresh new database.

I'm running postgresql-7.0.2-6 on a Debian potato.

-Yves

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-16 01:42:02 Re: Beta6 for Tomorrow?
Previous Message Philip Warner 2001-03-16 01:20:04 Re: Performance monitor signal handler

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2001-03-16 04:18:52 Re: Re: Normalization is always good?
Previous Message Christof Glaser 2001-03-16 00:48:51 Re: Re: Normalization is always good?