Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SIGTERM/FATAL error
Date: 2001-03-13 15:05:47
Message-ID: 200103131505.KAA10441@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom is there new wording we can agree on?

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Not sure. My admin tool is more proof of concept at this point. I
> > think ultimately we will need to allow administrators to such individual
> > backend terminations.
>
> I hope the tool is set up to encourage them to try something safer
> (ie, CANCEL QUERY) first...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Denis Perchine 2001-03-13 15:15:17 Re: problem with fe/be protocol and large objects
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-13 15:03:18 Re: Performance monitor signal handler